The argument
Second John warns about deceivers who do not confess Yeshua Messiah coming in flesh. The Greek participle can carry a present or characteristic sense, and translations differ on whether the emphasis is “has come” or “coming.” Luke speaks of the plural days of the Son of Man, while 1 Timothy continues to call the exalted mediator “the man Messiah Yeshua.” Together, the texts preserve the human identity of the expected King.
Why it matters
A wineskin trained to expect God the Son may reject the returning man as insufficiently divine. Resurrection Society prepares to recognize Yahweh's human Messiah without forcing him into the image that replaced him.
Second John 7 is disputed in translation and is not, by itself, a complete return chronology. The larger conclusion rests on the continuing New Testament distinction between Yahweh and the exalted man He appointed.
